Event Coverage

Credible data key to Indonesia’s efforts to solve forest fire, emissions challenges — expert

On peatlands, one single fire can produce five to six times more carbon emissions than clearing the same land area by other means.
Shares
0
Penelitian oleh Center for International Forestry Research tentang kebakaran di Sumatera di tahun 2013 menunjukkan, hampir seperempatnya terjadi pada perkebunan industri kelapa sawit dan akasia, serta hanya sedikit yang terjadi di hutan alam. 
Kredit Foto: gambar NASA oleh Jeff Schmaltz/LANCE/EOSDIS Respons cepat, Observatori bumi NASA
Penelitian oleh Center for International Forestry Research tentang kebakaran di Sumatera di tahun 2013 menunjukkan, hampir seperempatnya terjadi pada perkebunan industri kelapa sawit dan akasia, serta hanya sedikit yang terjadi di hutan alam. Kredit Foto: gambar NASA oleh Jeff Schmaltz/LANCE/EOSDIS Respons cepat, Observatori bumi NASA

Most popular

Indonesia - WARSAW, Poland (5 December 2013) — Accurate information on the causes of wildfires and the amount of carbon emissions they produce is critical if Indonesia is to meet its emissions reductions targets, said experts at an event on the sidelines of the U.N. climate change meetings in Warsaw, Poland.

Earlier this year, fires swept across parts of the Indonesian island of Sumatra — sending smoke billowing across the narrow Strait of Malacca and causing record-breaking air pollution levels in Singapore and Malaysia.

Daniel Murdiyarso, a principal scientist with the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), said that the international media attention the event generated must be translated into funding for more detailed research — and a commitment by the Indonesian government to address the issue.

“The haze occurred in the wrong time in the wrong place — and so it got to the attention of media very quickly,” Murdiyarso said. “If it had blown towards the Indian Ocean, the story would have been different.”

When the environment ministers of Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Brunei met in July to discuss the fires, they urged Indonesia to do more to tackle them.

DATA DELIVERY

Murdiyarso says this is an opportunity for Indonesia to invest in the technologies that will enable the country to accurately measure “activity data” and “emissions factors” — used to assess greenhouse gas emissions due to the conversion of forest to agricultural land.

“This is a long-overdue process – we need to inform the policy community with really credible data,” Murdiyarso said.

This would give Indonesia more information about the causes and consequences of fires, and enable the government to identify actions that can help it to meet its target of a 26 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, he said.

“Looking at the magnitude and causes of the carbon emissions from land-use change, this is a low-hanging fruit. On peatlands, one single fire can produce five to six times more carbon emissions than would be produced by clearing the same land area by other means.”

“That means tackling the underlying causes of fire is something the government can do relatively quickly, but have a big impact on emissions and transboundary pollution.”

CIFOR research into the fires has indicated that nearly a quarter of the June fires burned in industrial oil palm and acacia plantations, and very few took place in natural forests.

But the research raised more questions than answers.

COMPLEX CAUSES

“The fire this year is very interesting because it did not happen in an El Niño year,” Murdiyarso said, referring to the weather phenomenon that usually causes dry conditions across much of Indonesia.

People typically wait for a long dry spell, Murdiyarso said, to burn off the land. But this year hasn’t been particularly dry. “So there must be something else that drives them to burn — maybe the market is very attractive to quickly plant agricultural crops, to quickly produce the commodity, to meet the demand of the market.”

“People tend to think fires are accidental, driven by something biophysical — but often the market drives them. The socio-economic reality on the ground is much more complex than what we thought.”

While Indonesia’s neighbors did suffer the effects of the haze, the fires had a more severe impact locally — causing respiratory problems in youth and the elderly, and affecting people’s livelihoods, Murdiyarso said.

Local governments also need to be more engaged in tackling the problem, not just by fighting the fires, but also preventing them through proper land-use planning, he said. 

“I hope these locally relevant issues can be nicely linked to the global initiatives, so that the activities on the ground, at the local or national level, match with the global interest to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” Murdiyarso said.

Farhan Helmy, secretary of the Mitigation Working Group at Indonesia’s National Council on Climate Change (DNPI), said the Indonesian government is taking the fires seriously.

Since July, Helmy said, DNPI has been working on a comprehensive report about the drivers and greenhouse gas emissions from the fires. The report will be released in the coming weeks.

DNPI aims to share the report with Indonesian line ministries and other interested organizations, and open a dialogue between scientists and policy makers on the topic.

“My worry is that we discuss the same thing next year — but without a resolution. And all we do is wait for the rain to come — so we would like to have more comprehensive solutions on this,” Helmy said.

“We have to stop what is happening now — enough is enough.”

 

For more information about the issues discussed in this article, contact Daniel Murdiyarso, d.murdiyarso@cgiar.org.

This work forms part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry.

(Visited 317 times, 1 visits today)
Topic(s) :   Fire & haze Indonesian Wetlands
More in Fire & haze
See all on Fire & haze or Indonesian Wetlands
Most popular

  • I take note of your concern over forest fire loss. There is nothing more destructive than a forest fire, not only to plants but also to most animals. I suggest that we should take much more action to prevent such loss than we do. I think I know of an inexpensive way of creating a forest fire break that would limit the damage. That is to create cleared strips with a plywood wall, especially if combined with a wooden pipe sprinkler system. If the wall were treated with sodium silicate solution it would become fire proof itself. I do not have data as to the feasibility of preventing rain from washing out the sodium silicate, but I am confident that certain paints would work. You may see this discussed in detail in http://www.angelfire.com/nc/isoptera/index.html .
    As for preemptive fires, deliberate setting of fires in our forests borders on insanity. Letting accidental fires rage out of control is almost as nutty. A much more sensible solution would be to remove and grind up debris and brush either for farm soil organic amendments or to generate electricity, the last giving a by product of potassium hydroxide for acid soil. It would be much safer than coal mining and probably cheaper.

    Even if I have not persuaded you that forest fires are not a good idea, at least I am sure you would agree that protecting people’s wooden homes located in forests would be in order. It is not too smart to allow our homes outside of forests to burn down either. When they are rebuilt, huge amounts of energy and wood are used. Funerals for the ones who fail to make it out in time use a fair amount of energy also. My vote is none of such funerals and many less for coal miners by use of sodium silicate.

    Sincerely, Charles Weber